Welcome to the blog for Prof. John Talbird's English 201 class. The purpose of this site is two-fold: 1) to continue the conversations we start in class (or to start conversations BEFORE we get to class) and 2) to practice our writing/reading on a weekly basis in an informal forum.
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
Initial reaction to 'David Copperfield'
I began reading David Copperfield and my first impression was that it was going to be a book along the lines of the fantasy genre. I thought it was something like 'Benjamin Button' and I was growing fond of it mostly because of chapter one, when David said he remembered his birth. This sounded a bit like fantasy because I misunderstood it. Also, in chapter one I didn't understand what they meant by the word ‘caul’. I looked it up and there were two definitions that could be fit into the text. As I continued to read I noticed that David Copperfield’s mother was a lady that got around since she's been married about four times. After reading the nine chapters, I noticed the book wasn’t going a fantasy and the book started to be different. I love to read fantasy books and mystery books so the book David Copperfield lost my attention when i noticed it wasn’t anything near those genres. However, I’m always open to try new things and so far the book hasn’t lost my attention but hasn’t excited me either so I’m hoping the book will get better.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Jean-Paul, a caul is a covering over an infant's skull, part of the amniotic fluid. Supposedly, cauls were sold to some superstitious sailors in the 19th century as a charm against drowning. I think Dickens is having a bit of fun w/ this superstition here.
ReplyDelete